Archive for February, 2012

The Real Impact of “Made in China”

What fraction of United States consumer spending goes for Chinese goods and what part of that fraction reflects the actual cost of imports from China?  The U.S. Content of  Made in China, a study by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, looked at these questions and revealed some surprisingly positive results.
Keys points from the study include:

  • Although globalization is widely recognized these days, the U.S. economy actually remains relatively closed. The vast majority of goods and services sold in the United States are produced here. In 2010, imports were about 16 percent of U.S. GDP; imports from China amounted to 2.5 percent of GDP.
  • A total of 88.5 percent of U.S. consumer spending is on items made in the United States. This is largely because services, which make up about two-thirds of spending, are mainly produced locally.
  • 36 percent of the price U.S. consumers pay for imported goods actually goes to U.S. companies and workers, covering U.S. transportation, wholesale, and retail activities, including marketing the products.
  • The U.S. content of Chinese goods is much higher than for imports as a whole – 55 percent – mainly due to higher retail and wholesale margins on consumer electronics and clothing.

The import content of U.S. personal consumption expenditures (PCE) attributable to imports from China is useful in understanding where revenue generated by sales to U.S. households flows. It is also important because it affects to what extent price increases for Chinese goods are likely to pass through to U.S. consumer prices.
Based on this study, since the share of PCE attributable to imports from China is less than two percent, it is unlikely that recent increases in labor costs and inflation in China will generate broad-based inflationary pressures in the United States.

Top Markets for Life Science Companies

Investments focused on core R&D aspects of the life sciences value chain continue to fuel activity in established clusters in the United States and Europe.  Jones Lang LaSalle’s Global Life Sciences Report indicates that real estate activity is most prominent in cornerstone locales, such as the Bay Area, New York/New Jersey corridor, San Diego, Boston and Seattle in the United States.  The scale and breadth of investment over the last decade in India and China suggests companies are looking to these countries as both revenue and margin opportunities.

Within the United States, several emerging clusters have been on the radar for some time, but have failed to reach a critical tipping point.  For example, Chicago and Houston have very strong intellectual capacities and research institutions, but struggle to translate innovation from bench to marketplace due to lacking fiscal support or programming.  Others, like Florida, Minneapolis and Indianapolis, have strong industry representation but remain challenged by lackluster funding from the National Institutes of Health and venture capital sources.

India and China are clearly areas of focus as both revenue and margin opportunities.  Canada is emerging as a R&D location and Brazil for manufacturing.  Puerto Rico, the second largest investment destination in the region, struggles to retain a viable value proposition to companies with incentives that have, or are about to, end.  Outside of these countries, only Mexico, Argentina, Colombia and Peru are being tested as platforms for either manufacturing or R&D, but all are far behind the others in investment activity.

NAIOP Senior Executive Economics Conference with the Zell/Lurie Center for Real Estate

Senior-level commercial real estate development professionals including developers, owners, investors, attorneys, brokers and lenders are encouraged to join their peers for the NAIOP Senior Executive Economics Conference with the Zell/Lurie Center for Real Estate at Wharton, May 16 -17, 2012. The conference, Investing and Operating in the Property Markets, will address the critical topics faced by industry leaders making vital day-to-day decisions on investing and operating in today’s changing real estate markets and uncertain economic landscape. Registration is open now, and due to the exclusivity of this event, space is limited.

Employment Picture Brighter Says Cassidy Turley

Are the jobs being created ones that drive demand for commercial real estate?  Yes, says Kevin Thorpe, chief economist with Cassidy Turley.  The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reports that the professional and business services sector added 70,000 jobs in January 2012 while the manufacturing sector added 50,000 jobs.  The ISM manufacturing index rose in January as well, all of which is a beginning pattern of accelerated recovery, states Thorpe in the U.S. Employment Tracker.

Who is faring the best in terms of office and industrial employment?  Dallas, New York, Seattle and Washington, DC on the office side and Chicago, Houston and Seattle on the industrial side.  The report provides statistics on the employment situation for 41 metro areas.

Bridging the Manufacturing Talent Gap

The shortage of available, qualified manufacturing workers has been going on for years and a new report shows that the hardest jobs to fill are those that have the biggest impact on performance.  What is most important to the future success of manufacturing companies, and by association, increased demand for industrial space?  The 2011 Skills Gap Report, by The Manufacturing Institute and Deloitte Consulting LLP seek to answer these questions and more in their comprehensive report

Report highlights include:
The hardest jobs to fill are those that have the biggest impact on performance.  The report indicates that 74 percent of survey respondents have workforce shortages or skills deficiencies in skilled production roles, significantly impacting their ability to expand operations.

While they recognize the importance of recruiting and developing talent, many manufacturers depend on outdated approaches (i.e., word-of-mouth recruiting) for finding the right people, developing their employees’ skills and improving their performance.

High unemployment is not making it easier to fill positions, particularly skilled production.  As many as 600,000 jobs are going unfilled and the national education curriculum is not producing workers with the basic skills needed.

Supply chain integration ranked the lowest in terms of what respondents reported as most important to future business success during the next three to five years.

The changing nature of manufacturing work is making it harder for talent to keep up.  The number one skills deficiency among employees is problem solving.

The skills gap is expected to take the biggest toll on skilled production jobs, and will likely widen as time passes.  Eighty percent of respondents indicate that machinists, operators, craft workers, distributors and technician positions will be hardest hit by retirements in the coming years.  Companies expect the skilled production group to be the hardest to find in the job market.

NAIOP Silicon Valley Brokers Panel Luncheon

On Thursday February 2, 2012 nearly 200 commercial real estate industry leaders attended the annual NAIOP Silicon Valley Brokers Panel Luncheon. Mike Biggar of Orchard Partners moderated a panel that consisted of Phil Mahoney, Joe Moriarty, CB Richard Ellis, and Erich Sengelmann.

Next Page »


Visit Our Website

Categories

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 16 other followers


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.